<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saab 9-3 Turbo-X Review From Singapore!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saabhistory.com/2009/02/03/saab-9-3-turbo-x-review-from-singapore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saabhistory.com/2009/02/03/saab-9-3-turbo-x-review-from-singapore/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=saab-9-3-turbo-x-review-from-singapore</link>
	<description>1947 - 2011</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:10:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.saabhistory.com/2009/02/03/saab-9-3-turbo-x-review-from-singapore/#comment-1109</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 01:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saabhistory.com/2009/02/03/saab-9-3-turbo-x-review-from-singapore/#comment-1109</guid>
		<description>Your writing would be better if you avoided Newsspeak and stuck with plain English.  &quot;This particular report&quot;? Why pad &quot;this&quot;? &quot;Particular&quot; adds nothing. Leave it. &quot;Would be actually impressive in terms of its performance.&quot; How about &quot;would make its performance impressive&quot; or &quot;make for impressive performance.&quot;  The &quot;actually&quot; and &quot;in terms of&quot; are junk terms--its bad enough when newscasters babble this sort of pseudo-impressive lingo; in writing, it&#039;s inexcusable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your writing would be better if you avoided Newsspeak and stuck with plain English.  &#8220;This particular report&#8221;? Why pad &#8220;this&#8221;? &#8220;Particular&#8221; adds nothing. Leave it. &#8220;Would be actually impressive in terms of its performance.&#8221; How about &#8220;would make its performance impressive&#8221; or &#8220;make for impressive performance.&#8221;  The &#8220;actually&#8221; and &#8220;in terms of&#8221; are junk terms&#8211;its bad enough when newscasters babble this sort of pseudo-impressive lingo; in writing, it&#8217;s inexcusable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

